A letter from Dr. Land to President-Elect Obama,
I would like to end all abortions. I have not seen that happen in conservative administrations and I don't think Roe v. Wade will be changed. But there is hope for change from the bottom up grass roots and from the top down.
When I spoke with folks about the election, pro-choice advocates said to me, "No one wants abortion." It's a permanent solution that alters many and destroys lives forever. Some women move on. Of course most cope because of the resilience of the human spirit.
But I have spoken to fathers who had no say, grandparents who had no say, women who live in regret, women who after having several abortions, when ready to start a family, never were able to have children. The scars are deep.
Why else would a liberal, pithy show like Boston Legal have it's two liberal protagonists (James Spader and Candace Bergen) share that they NEVER got over the loss of their unborn. Sure, they defended the "constitution." But they spoke what many don't - the enduring loss. Go to Silent No More and see the photos of women holding signs: "I regret my abortion." Do I want it to end completely? Yes. As I have said, choice is a great thing. And as a feminist (mellowed) it is hard to swallow that women would have their bodies legislated, but men would not be forced to have vasectomies if they were "serial" fathers of the terminated children. Like it or not, you can't be "fair." Nothing is black and white. But the rights of the unborn have to be defended. If we don't speak on their behalf, who then? A civilization that allows 50 million lives to be destroyed, is a civilization that has more problems than Wall Street/Main Street.
Just remember, that baby that the doctors say will be born with debilitating disease and may suffer, when born, could be the next Stephen Hawkins. Could be the joy of a family, even if life is short. Worse yet, as friends found out just before they terminated late in a pregnancy, the test could be wrong. Saying you can't afford another child or a child seems a reasonable argument. Except many of those losing jobs still have to find a way to support the children they chose. Life has no guarantees.
The ONLY hope we have is our moral compass. What is the underpinning of everything? Life. A precious gift we are blessed with. I would rather see an end to abortions and will be volunteering in many ways to help reach that goal.
President-elect Obama has taught us all one thing: we each have a voice. We each have a responsibility to speak, to advocate, to work for change. I am working for this change. I am taking President-elect Obama up on his call to us for a grass roots participation.
So Dear President-elect Obama, I ask that as a Christian, you look upon this country and the foundation of its freedoms - including the basic right to life. The most basic of rights. I ask you to look at the letter Dr. Land has sent. It is a start. It's not the solution I want, but it's a start. And in my view, people can't be pro-life and not offer solutions to the mothers and their children.
Finally, I pray that we never create stem cell embryo farms to help anyone ill. I understand that if those embryos that are frozen now are going to be tossed out like trash because they will never be used, if redirected, they could save or heal life. And I'm okay with that. But it's a slippery slope. If anyone ever opens the door to allow people to sell embryos, farm them like tomatoes, then we as a civilization are doomed.
Below is a letter from Dr. Land that I support. It's not a perfect solution. But it's a start. And I will work from the ground up to end abortions.
Dear President-elect Obama,
- Nov 5, 2008 - 41
First, congratulations on your successful campaign to become the 44th President of our beloved United States of America. This was a historic election in terms of the massive increase in voter participation as a percentage of the electorate.
I hope you know that there are tens of millions of Americans who did not vote for you who are still very, very pleased that an African-American has been elected President of the United States.
The fact that this could happen in a country with as tragic a racial past as America’s says something noble and fine about the American experiment and the glorious “opportunity democracy” it has spawned. After much struggle, we as a nation have chosen together to live up to the promises of our founding document, the Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
For those of us who came of age during the Civil Rights Era and were inspired by Dr. King, it is very gratifying to watch our nation elect a person of color to the highest political office in the land, even someone for whom they may not have voted because of serious policy differences.
Mr. President-elect, the Bible exhorts us to pray for “kings and all who are in authority” (1 Tim. 2:1-2). We, therefore, covenant to pray for you, your family, and your administration. We will pray that God will grant you godly wisdom in all your decision-making. We pray with faith and confidence that “the king’s heart is in the hand of the Lord, as the rivers of water; he turneth it whithersoever he will” (Prov. 21:1).
On issues which involve moral and ethical values, we will both pray for you and exhort you to apply biblical principles and values as you make policy decisions which will impact the families of America and the world. We will also pray that God will bless you with safety, health and all spiritual blessings.
On issues where we agree, such as standing against genocide in Darfur and protecting basic human rights around the world, we will support you.
On issues where we disagree with the approach your administration takes, we will do our best to persuade you to change your approach. When we are unsuccessful, we will stand by our convictions and will exercise our God-given responsibilities and Constitutionally-protected right to work for alternative solutions which are more in accord with our convictions.
Southern Baptists remain unalterably committed to the protection of unborn human life. The vast majority of Southern Baptists believe that a pre-born baby is a distinct human life, according to both science and the Bible (Ps. 51:5; Ps. 139-13-16; Jer. 1:5; Luke 1:41). The euphemism of “choice” or “reproductive freedom” cannot disguise or justify killing a baby. Government has a proper role in protecting lives, including the lives of the unborn. Southern Baptists, by national resolutions, have opposed abortion on demand, and have called for public policies which severely restrict abortion and which promote alternatives such as adoption.
Mr. President-elect, you have said you want to unite us as a nation. An excellent place to work for such unity and consensus on the life issue would be for you to put your full and vigorous support behind the Democrats for Life House Caucus initiative known as the Pregnant Women Support Act or the 95-10 Initiative (because its goal is to reduce abortion by 95% over a ten-year period).
This bill (H.R. 3192 and S. 2407), sponsored in the last Congress by Rep. Lincoln Davis (D-TN) and Sen. Robert Casey (D-PA), would, among other things:
- Establish a toll-free number to direct women to places that will provide support during and following their pregnancy;
- Fund collection of accurate data on abortion;
- Provide child care to low-income and student parents;
- Provide parenting education in maternity group homes;
- Make the Adoption Tax Credits permanent;
- Ensure that pregnant women are not denied health care by insurance companies and that coverage is continued for newborns;
- Codify the regulation that extends coverage under the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) to low-income pregnant women and unborn children;
- Improve services for pregnant women who are victims of domestic violence;
- Provide services to parents receiving a positive test diagnosis for Down syndrome or other prenatally diagnosed conditions;
- Increase funding for the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Nutrition Program;
- Provide grants to institutions of higher education to fund pregnant and parenting student services;
- Provide new mothers with free home visits by registered nurses.
All of these measures would help fulfill the pledge made in the 2008 Democratic Party platform, which “strongly supports a woman’s decision to have a child by ensuring access to and availability of programs for pre- and post-natal health care, parenting skills, income support, and caring adoption programs.”
Mr. President-elect, America needs moral conviction, not moral neutrality. America’s children need a model of leadership committed both to excellence and to virtue. May God help you, Mr. President-elect, and make you that leader. And may God bless America!
Yours in His service,
Richard Land
The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission works to protect the sanctity of human life by supporting bills such as the Pregnant Women Support Act. If you would like to learn more about this issue, additional resources are available here.

Comments
As illegal alcohol (and illegal drugs and prostitution) provide organized crime with avenues for making money, I think a return to an outran ban on abortion would return abortion to the hands of organized crime. Rich women will always have a choice as they can travel to get what they want, but the less affluent and particularly the poor will be relegated to organized crime sources -- if they're lucky -- and back alley do-it-yourself hacks, coathangers and other dangerous means if they're not. Thus, the outright banning of abortion wouldn't make abortion stop, any more than banning alcohol, drugs, or prostitution has eliminated those activities. It just makes them more dangerous. Plus, you add a whole lot of mothers dying along with their unborn children.
Thus, using law as a way to address abortion and other similar "vice crimes" isn't particularly effective and it costs millions of dollars and millions of headaches to prosecute. Plus it opens up another can of worms with violating the right to privacy and right to bodily integrity.
I think a more effective goal than the outright banning of abortion is to seek to reduce abortions, while at the same time allowing it to remain safe and legal. (Similarly, I think that drug and alcohol abuse and, in some aspects, prostitution, ought to be addressed as medical issues rather than legal ones.)
How is this done? There are several approaches, all of which should be used. First of all, as Dr Land has listed is to address the reasons why women choose abortion and to ameliorate the problems there, which are mainly related to poverty and lack of supportive resources for parents of young children.
Secondly is education, which is to support comprehensive sex education in the schools so young people know how to prevent pregnancies before they happen. This goes hand in hand with supporting all forms of birth control and research into newer, more effective and more safe options. Education is also needed to reduce the stigma against non-marital sexual expression and single parents.
Third, the foster care and adoption system in this country needs to be fixed. Presently there are hundreds of thousands of children languishing in foster care, many of whom will never be adopted. If abortion is outlawed across the board, where will all the extra children who are put up for adoption go? As an aside, I find it incomprehensible that when there are so many children available for adoption in our own country, that many couples go overseas to adopt children, China being a favorite choice.
Also, with a decade of seeing abused children while working as a cop, I can tell you that the child welfare services are overburdened and frequently do not adequately serve the children they are charged to protect. In many instances, they get there too late for the children. There's generally a lot of time and bureaucracy involved before a child is removed permanently from defective parents, as the mindset is to try to keep the family together and give the parent every chance to straighten up. So, even if the worst doesn't happen, the child often ends up being bounced from pillar to post, from foster care to home to foster care to home in a vicious circle, that leaves the kid to grow up emotionally scarred in any instance. And in the worst cases, it's hard for me not to think that abortion might have been the lesser evil in such cases.
So, for the reasons listed above, I could never support an outright ban on abortion. It's not a simple issue and there are not and can not be simple solutions.
In re: stem cell research, this, too isn't a simple issue and there is much good to be gained from it, particularly in Alzheimer's research. It is this issue in particular that caused the Reagan family to break away from the Republican party. Likewise, this is a complicated issue that will require complicated solutions.
Moving on. I think you and Land make enough points that I totally agree with at least its a place to start - bottom up. I agree with your points. (You certainly don't look like a former cop!) :))))) I respect your opinion. It is tough. Listen, I supported the decriminilization of marijuana in MA. So my kids could be free to smoke? Heck no. So people who make dumb mistakes aren't forever ruined by having a small amount of pot and so the prison system isn't taxed further and decent, stupid people aren't forever changed by enduring coexisting with hardened criminals.
Too much to respond to stem cell here. It is complicated. Ethics are. I just think it's a slipperty slope. Open the door to using all the embryos that are frozen and will be summarily disposed of being used for healing is great. But once open, do we clone, farm, sell? That's my fear. That's all it is.
Thanks for posting. I'm glad you didn't hold back. Remember I see both side all the time. To my detriment. And I have finally taken strong, open stands on a few issues.
I also have an aversion to pro life advocates quoting scripture to support their argument. Imposing religious beliefs on others through legislation is a denial of the rights of those who may have other, or no, religious beliefs.
There is no simple answer to ethical concerns regarding abortion, or stem cell research. Ultimately, the choice must remain with the individual, for by pro life advocates presuming to speak for the rights of the unborn, they necessarily repress the rights of the individual concerned. And the right to choose what to do with one's body must remain the choice of the individual. Imperfect, I know, but it's an imperfect life.
Otherwise, I can't add to Libertine's well considered arguments. That isn't to say that I don't respect your pro life argument. I just disagree with it.
I'm pro-life and pro-choice. The two are not mutually exclusive. According to people on the forced-birth side of the fence, a rape survivor shouldn't have a choice other than to have her rapist's baby. Is that just and right?
Abortion is too complicated a matter to make black and white or good and evil. People have views all along the spectrum all with good intentions from their POV. The problem is forcing women to yield control of their body to the state. What's next? From the fundie extremist POV, they want to eliminate abortion rights AND access to contraception AND reality-based sex ed in schools. I hate to break it to you, but that's a recipe for disaster that will increase the number of unplanned pregnancies and cases of STDs. Is that God's plan? Quite frankly it doesn't matter what the man upstairs thinks because we are talking about civil law, not the relationship between a woman and whatever deity she believes in, if she's a believer at all.
a. I wrote a series of articles leading to this one - including the story of MY aborition. So you missed foundations that would give me the credibility of one who has been there and who has seen a lot.
b. I do not judge those who had them. How could I? Many women suffer long after. Again, if you care, read back to the experience of someone who has been through it all.
c. I wrote I believe in sex education and I believe (unlike my religion) in birth control. You can't have it both ways. You want to stop abortions? Then teach young girls how to protect themselves from STDs, unwanted pregnancies,etc. It FLAMES me when people say do away with the birth control. HUH? Are you serious? Don't teach teen girls how to protect themselves? Okay, well let's have little teen pregnant mother support groups like the high school in Gloucester, MA. My view as I wrote in my prior posts - which were many during a 40 day for life campaign I signed up for and you'll see my sign in photo. I used to support Planned Parenthood until I looked.
Again, I don't want to see "back alley abortions." But read the series of posts. How are we so shocked that thousands of mostly men and many women are killed in war, but we aren't horrified that the equivalent of countless jumbo jets of new life drive into the ground daily. 50 million.
In this post, the minister of another faith talked about ways to avoid abortion. Can we all agree on that? As in avoid pregnancy? I think on that you and I agree. On much you and I agree on this topic. I hope I make sense. But if you care, read before this letter and you'll see, I'm not some "haven't got a clue, have always been a good girl Catholic." Far, far from it.
d. About 1% of abortions were due to rape or incest (statistics in prior post). And on that, I cannot speak nor will I speak to what the person should do.
e.